The Question of Resurrection
Matthew 22:23-33
We gather each week at this time to read, exposit, and apply the scriptures. We do so because we believe what the Apostle Paul says, that “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.” (2 Tim. 3:16-17). We believe that the Bible is the very word of God, inspired by the Holy Spirit, and is completely authoritative and sufficient. Today, in our study of Matthew 22, we meet a group of men who claim to know God, but who do not understand or believe the scriptures.
Remember our context: Jesus was teaching the people in the temple (Matt. 21:23) just a couple days before the crucifixion. The religious leaders in Jerusalem opposed Jesus at every turn. They questioned His authority (Matt. 21:23-27). They refused to believe in Jesus (Matt. 21:32) and sought to lay hands on Him (Matt. 21:26) and destroy Him (Matt. 12:14).
So, they plotted to entangle Jesus in His words (Matt. 22:15) by asking Him some perplexing questions designed to trip Him up, discredit Him in front of the people, or indict Him before the Roman authorities. And each time, He their questions with such wisdom and authority that His opponents were silenced. First, the Pharisees sent their disciples and some Herodians to ask a political question about paying taxes to Caesar. This morning, we see another group, the Sadducees, who ask Jesus a theoretical question about the resurrection. And like the Pharisees, these men were not seeking the truth. They were unrepentant and settled in their unbelief.
As believers, living in the midst of a fallen world, unbelieving people may confront us with perplexing questions too. Sometimes, the questions come from those who have a genuine desire to know the answers. The lawyer’s question about the greatest commandment that we’ll be studying next time may fit this category (Matt. 22:34-40). But often, they come someone who has already made up his or her mind to ‘disbelieve’ before they ask the question. In those cases, the questions are just an attempt to make faith in Jesus Christ look absurd.
That’s the nature of the Sadducees question about the resurrection of the dead. In answering, Jesus not only teaches the truth about the resurrection, He also gives us an example of how to answer their suborn unbelief. He teaches us how to faithfully affirm the word and power of God when faced with the scoffing questions of unbelief. Our text has two main parts, the Sadducees riddle and Jesus’ answer, followed by Matthew’s account of the people’s response.
First, let’s look at . . .
1. The Resurrection Riddle (Matt. 22:23-28).
Matthew 22:23 says, “The same day the Sadducees, who say there is no resurrection, came to Him and asked Him…” Having just dispensed with the trick question of the Pharisees, Jesus had barely caught His breath when a group of Sadducees showed up with their own trick question.
A. The Questioners: Sadducees (Matt. 22:23).
Who were the Sadducees? In the days that Jesus walked on the earth, there were three or four basic religious “parties” among the Jewish people. Only two of them figure prominently in the New Testament. The first, the Pharisees, we have encountered already a number of times the gospel of in Matthew. They were careful students of the law of Moses, and they sought to expand upon that law through their traditions, rules, and regulations in order to protect themselves from breaking God’s law. Their name suggests the idea of “separation” from the common people they considered sinners. For the most part, they were popular among the people because of their outward show of righteousness. They opposed Jesus because He exposed their hypocrisy and unbelief.
The second group were the Sadducees. They were generally wealthy, and their influence was mostly among the upper classes of society. They High Priest and all the chief priests in Jerusalem were Sadducees. At the time of Jesus, they held the Jewish political power. Their name likely comes from a Hebrew word that means “the righteous”. They rejected the oral traditions that the Pharisees insisted on and believed that the only authoritative scripture was the first five books of the Old Testament, written by Moses.
Because of this, the Sadducees denied angels, spirits, and the afterlife (Acts 2:38). They denied that the dead would be raised unto eternal punishment or eternal rewards. They didn’t believe Moses taught those things. Therefore, the promises of “rewards” from God only concerned life on this earth. Their view of life was, for the most part, materialistic.
As you can imagine, the Pharisees and the Sadducees didn’t get along with each other. They constantly debated and jockeyed for power in the Sanhedrin. But they had this in common with the Pharisees: they also opposed Jesus and saw Him as a threat to their religious and political power. So, when these Sadducees watched and saw that the Pharisees failed to trap the Lord, they stepped in to try to trap the Lord.
Let’s look at . . .
B. The Question: Resurrection (Matt. 22:24-28)
They came to Him with a courteous greeting—calling Him “Teacher“; but they had hatred in their hearts against Him. They said, “Moses said that if a man dies, having no children, his brother shall marry his wife and raise up offspring for his brother” (Matt. 22:24).
The setting for their riddle comes from a law found in Deuteronomy. It was often called “the levirite law”—taken from the Latin word for ‘brother-in-law’ (levir). The Sadducees believed in this law, because it was found in the Scriptures given through Moses. Deuteronomy 25:5-6 says,
“If brothers dwell together, and one of them dies and has no son, the widow of the dead man shall not be married to a stranger outside the family; her husband’s brother shall go in to her, take her as his wife, and perform the duty of a husband’s brother to her. And it shall be that the firstborn son which she bears will succeed to the name of his dead brother, that his name may not be blotted out of Israel” (Deuteronomy 25:5-6).
To the Jewish people, it would be a great tragedy for a man to die without any offspring to carry on his name and preserve his inheritance of land. So, God gave this law to provide for the widow who remained, and to perpetuate the dead man’s name and inheritance. The Sadducees quote the law as saying, “his brother shall marry his wife and raise up offspring for his brother” (Matt. 22:24). The verb they use for “raise up” is the same root word as the term “resurrection”. And it’s here where we see the subtlety of the Sadducees. This was their form of resurrection belief. People are only resurrected in the sense that their children are raised up to continue their line.
They weren’t really concerned about the levirate marriage law. They just used it to craft their “trick question” to trap Jesus in His words. In Matthew 22:25-27 we have their riddle:
25 “Now there were with us seven brothers. The first died after he had married, and having no offspring, left his wife to his brother. 26 Likewise the second also, and the third, even to the seventh. 27 Last of all the woman died also.”
The Sadducees said that these seven brothers were “with” them, but it’s pretty safe to assume that they made up this story. Can you really imagine all seven brothers willingly marrying this woman, after all their brothers before them kept dying as her husband? It is so far-fetched and extreme that it could never happen in real life. The Sadducees built off this Old Testament law using this absurd scenario of seven brothers, each of whom keeps marrying the same wife and then dying before they have any children. Their intention is clear. They want to make the whole idea of resurrection look just as absurd as their scenario.
The technical name of this form of argument is reductio ad absurdum. It was meant to follow a speculation about the resurrection all the way through, until it was reduced to the level of absurdity. It’s a little like how one famous atheist used to ask if, when God bodily raised us from the dead on the last day, He was planning to resurrect all our old haircuts and fingernail-clippings as well. It was not a sincere question. It was simply a question asked out of a spirit of unbelief—one that was designed to make our Lord scramble around for some answer to a ridiculous question in an effort to save face.
Having laid the trap through this crazy story, they spring it on Jesus by asking, “Therefore, in the resurrection, whose wife of the seven will she be? For they all had her.” (Matt. 22:28).
They think they’re so smart! Just like the Pharisees thought they “got” Jesus with the question about paying taxes to Caesar, the Sadducees think they’ve “got” Jesus with this question. She can’t be married to them all, right? So, whose wife will she be? Is it the first brother? The last one? One of the brothers in between? It’s a ridiculous scenario which they think proves the absurdity of the resurrection.
However, just as Jesus got the better of the Pharisees in last week’s passage, so he gets the better of the Sadducees in this week’s passage. Look at …
2. Jesus’ Response (Matt. 22:29-32).
First, Jeuss tells them they are in error.
A. Two Errors of Unbelief (Matt. 22:29)
Jesus tells them right away, “You are mistaken . . .” The word that He used is one that meant “to be led astray” or “to be made to wander about”. The idea is that they were not just in error, they were lost, “deceived” in their thinking. They had wandered far from the way of truth. They had derailed from the straight path of the word of God. Jesus says that they were led astray by the condition of their thinking—”not knowing the Scriptures nor the power of God” (Matt. 22:29).
The word “knowing”, in its normal use, simply refers to having information that results in understanding. But it can also refer to having a close and intimate relationship with something or someone. And, in some cases, it refers recognizing and having respect and reverence something or someone. A good example of this is found in 1 Thessalonians 5:12; where Paul writes to his believing friends and tells them, ” And we urge you, brethren, to recognize those who labor among you, and are over you in the Lord and admonish you.” The ESV translates it “respect those who labor among you.”
Here is the nature of their error: It was all in the attitude of their minds and hearts. The Scriptures and the power of God had been set before them; but they didn’t “know” these things. They didn’t recognize or respect them. And because they didn’t begin with an attitude of respect for God’s word or God’s power—or more to the point, because they chose to “disbelieve” these things at the very start—they were led astray in their thinking and were “mistaken”.
So then, having exposed the attitude of unbelief from which the question was raised in the first place, notice how Jesus shows them their error regarding . . .
B. The Power of God in the Resurrection (Matt. 22:30).
The Sadducees had assumed that, when the Bible taught about the resurrection, it meant a resurrection into exactly the same state of being that the person was in before he or she died. And so, obviously, such an assumption would create a ridiculous picture—seven resurrected brothers having to arm-wrestle over whose wife the resurrected, seven-time widow would be. But Jesus says, “For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels of God in heaven” (Matt. 22:30).
“Marriage” is something that God made for life on earth. God provided marriage for the perpetuation of the humankind because He knew people would die. It was how God’s commandment to Adam and Eve was to be fulfilled—to be fruitful, and multiply, fill the earth, and subdue it (Gen. 1:28). It was also God’s means of preserving a “godly offspring” in this dark, fallen world (Mal. 2:14). And because God decreed that it is not good for man to be alone (Gen. 2:18), marriage is His gracious provision for the deep human need for a companion and fellow-heir in “the grace of life” (1 Peter 3:7).[1]
But in the resurrection—when God’s people are raised from the dead to enter into the full experience of eternal life—this “earthly” arrangement will no longer be needed. We will be “like angels of God in heaven“. We won’t be angels, of course, but we will be like angels. We will have none of the limitations and needs that we experience now in these unglorified bodies of ours. Because there will be no more death in heaven, there will be no need to perpetuate the human race by procreation. There will be no need for the same kind of companionship we needed in the struggles and trials of earthly life, because those things will be no more. We will all be together, forever, in perfection and in perfect joy.
Like many of you, I love my wife, and want to be with her forever in heaven. And I will. It may not be in the same kind of relationship that we enjoyed on earth, but it will be in a relationship that is deeper and more profound than what we can understand even in marriage. All our relationships in heaven will be free from sin and its effects.
The point is that the Sadducees were mistaken in not giving proper respect and reverence to the power of God. They didn’t know just how great God’s power is to transform His people from the state of sinful fallenness, which characterizes us now, into a state of heavenly glory that is like that of the angels.
C. Proof of Resurrection in the Scriptures (Matt. 22:30-32)
Second, Jesus sets the Sadducees straight about the Scriptures with respect to the resurrection of the dead. As you remember, they only regarded the five books of Moses as authoritative. But Jesus shows them that they didn’t even respect those Scriptures. Jesus shows them that these very same Scriptures support the resurrection that they denied. He says, “But concerning the resurrection of the dead, have you not read what was spoken to you by God . . . ?” (Matt. 22:31).
He then quotes God speaking from Exodus 3:6, saying, “I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.” (Matt. 22:32). At the burning bush, God introduced Himself as the God of Moses’ ancestors—Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. And even though those three men had physically died centuries before Moses’ time, they nevertheless still existed before God, because God said that He was—right then—the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
From the very Scriptures they claimed to esteem, Jesus shows that these three patriarchs didn’t cease to exist when their bodies died. They still lived. They still owned God as their God. And God still owned them as His. Therefore, Jesus concludes, “God is not the God of the dead, but of the living.” As it says in Luke 20:38, “… for all live to Him.”
If Abraham, Isaac, and Joseph still lived before God apart from their decaying bodies, then He is absolutely capable of giving life to their dead bodies once more. If God could create man’s body from the dust of the earth, He could just as easily recreate men’s bodies from dust or ashes.
The point is that the Sadducees did not give proper reverence and respect to the Scriptures. They trifled with it but didn’t allow themselves to see the truths of the resurrection that were revealed in it—or in the other portions of Scripture that they arrogantly rejected.
Finally, notice . . .
3. The Response of the People (Matt. 22:33).
33 And when the multitudes heard this, they were astonished at His teaching. (Matt. 22:33).
Notice that Matthew doesn’t tell us the Sadducees’ response. Instead, we read of the multitudes that listened. I suspect that the multitudes had heard this kind of debate between the Sadducees and Pharisees before. But when they heard the Lord’s answer, we’re told that the multitudes literally were “struck out of their wits” by it.
What do we learn from our Lord’s answer to this “resurrection riddle”? Certainly, we learn that we can trust what the Bible teaches us about the hope of the resurrection. Most of all, we can trust it because our Lord proved it by rising from the dead Himself just a few days after this question was asked.
But we also can learn that when we are confronted with unbelieving questions designed to trip us up, we can follow the Lord’s example. We should always respond with courteousness and love. But when the question comes from someone who is stubbornly committed to unbelief, and whose motive is to discredit the faith, I believe our Lord’s example teaches us not to simply jump to the question first—as we’re so easily inclined to do.
First, we should prayerfully, lovingly, but resolutely—in the power and authority of the Holy Spirit—expose the unbelief in the heart of the one asking the question. We should be bold and honest, saying something like, “You are mistaken, friend. You are led astray by the fact that you have chosen to begin in the wrong place. You have chosen from the outset not to esteem God’s power nor His revealed word. You have chosen to begin in disbelief in these things and then to argue from your disbelief. And because you began on the wrong path, you will end up in the wrong place.”
And then, the Lord’s example teaches us that we should affirm what God’s word says. We’re to put His revealed word forth to them plainly, and let it speak for itself. They may hear it and repent. Or they may hear it and harden their hearts against God even more as the Sadducees likely did. But the results are not up to us. They are up to the Holy Spirit. Our job is to simply give them God’s truth from God’s word and let it do its work.
The apostle Paul summed this up for us very well. He said,
For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God, bringing every thought into captivity to the obedience of Christ . . . (2 Corinthians 10:4-5).
[1] Greg Allen, Giving an Answer to Unbelief, https://www.bethanybible.org/archive/2008/052508.htm